Franchise Player: TE, Jimmy Graham, NOS
- Wascawy Wabbits
- Pro Bowler
- Posts: 788
- Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2012 8:49 pm
- Favorite NFL Team: Kansas City Chiefs
- Team Name: Wascawy Wabits
- Location: BC, Canada
Franchise Player: TE, Jimmy Graham, NOS
14 Salary: $622,242
15 Tagged Salary: $4,893,333 (Top 3 TE salaries)
15 Tagged Salary: $4,893,333 (Top 3 TE salaries)

- Wascawy Wabbits
- Pro Bowler
- Posts: 788
- Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2012 8:49 pm
- Favorite NFL Team: Kansas City Chiefs
- Team Name: Wascawy Wabits
- Location: BC, Canada
Re: Franchise Player: TE, Jimmy Graham, NOS
Pretty surprised that Graham didn't get a single bid on him...

- braven112
- Site Admin
- Posts: 1265
- Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2007 5:05 pm
- Favorite NFL Team: Seattle Seahawks
- Team Name: Pacific Pigskins
- Location: Seattle, Washington
- Contact:
Re: Franchise Player: TE, Jimmy Graham, NOS
No kidding, you dodged a bullet. Hes cheap enough you can franchise him next year too. Nicely done.

- Wascawy Wabbits
- Pro Bowler
- Posts: 788
- Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2012 8:49 pm
- Favorite NFL Team: Kansas City Chiefs
- Team Name: Wascawy Wabits
- Location: BC, Canada
- bonscott
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 1037
- Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 10:09 am
- Favorite NFL Team: Chicago Bears
- Team Name: Amish Rakefighters
- Location: West Michigan
- Contact:
Re: Franchise Player: TE, Jimmy Graham, NOS
Gotta remember though it takes both a 1st and a 2nd to bid on a franchise and anyone with a high pick probably won't bother. Could be more guys like this that "slip thru" as we get more players tagged each year.
Also it's said to be a pretty deep rookie draft this year and thus that may make people with a top 10 pick think twice about bidding on a franchise player.
I have 1.13 and I wasn't going to bid on a franchise player at all, rather have the pick.
Then again, what do I know, I've only won one playoff game in how many years?

Also it's said to be a pretty deep rookie draft this year and thus that may make people with a top 10 pick think twice about bidding on a franchise player.

Then again, what do I know, I've only won one playoff game in how many years?


Scott


- Achon44
- Pro Bowler
- Posts: 656
- Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2008 11:30 am
- Favorite NFL Team: Cleveland Browns
- Team Name: Bring the Pain
- Location: The Land
- Contact:
Re: Franchise Player: TE, Jimmy Graham, NOS

bonscott wrote:Gotta remember though it takes both a 1st and a 2nd to bid on a franchise and anyone with a high pick probably won't bother. Could be more guys like this that "slip thru" as we get more players tagged each year.


- Wascawy Wabbits
- Pro Bowler
- Posts: 788
- Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2012 8:49 pm
- Favorite NFL Team: Kansas City Chiefs
- Team Name: Wascawy Wabits
- Location: BC, Canada
Re: Franchise Player: TE, Jimmy Graham, NOS
Dunno if we'll see more guys slip thru with a Franchise tag... Graham and Gronk are a unique situation that they've been so ridiculously cheap to roster during their rookie contracts and the franchise amount for TEs was also really cheap. My guess is that we'll probably still see more players just get tagged once and then dropped the next season with the Franchise tag always costing as much as it has. Tagging (or bidding on) Graham next year though is still way cheaper than he'd cost if he were to hit the open market.bonscott wrote:Gotta remember though it takes both a 1st and a 2nd to bid on a franchise and anyone with a high pick probably won't bother. Could be more guys like this that "slip thru" as we get more players tagged each year.
Also it's said to be a pretty deep rookie draft this year and thus that may make people with a top 10 pick think twice about bidding on a franchise player.I have 1.13 and I wasn't going to bid on a franchise player at all, rather have the pick.
Then again, what do I know, I've only won one playoff game in how many years?![]()
I was actually hoping that someone was going to bid on Graham so I could let him go and bid on Gronk... LOL!
Happily roster Graham for under $5m








- Wascawy Wabbits
- Pro Bowler
- Posts: 788
- Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2012 8:49 pm
- Favorite NFL Team: Kansas City Chiefs
- Team Name: Wascawy Wabits
- Location: BC, Canada
Re: Franchise Player: TE, Jimmy Graham, NOS
That didn't make sense after re-reading it.. LOLWascawy Wabbits wrote:Dunno if we'll see more guys slip thru with a Franchise tag... Graham and Gronk are a unique situation that they've been so ridiculously cheap to roster during their rookie contracts and the franchise amount for TEs was also really cheap. My guess is that we'll probably still see more players just get tagged once and then dropped the next season with the Franchise tag always costing as much as it has. Tagging (or bidding on) Graham next year though is still way cheaper than he'd cost if he were to hit the open market.bonscott wrote:Gotta remember though it takes both a 1st and a 2nd to bid on a franchise and anyone with a high pick probably won't bother. Could be more guys like this that "slip thru" as we get more players tagged each year.
Also it's said to be a pretty deep rookie draft this year and thus that may make people with a top 10 pick think twice about bidding on a franchise player.I have 1.13 and I wasn't going to bid on a franchise player at all, rather have the pick.
Then again, what do I know, I've only won one playoff game in how many years?![]()
I was actually hoping that someone was going to bid on Graham so I could let him go and bid on Gronk... LOL!
Happily roster Graham for under $5m
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
I don't see a huge difference changing w/ the franchised players. They don't typically get bid on to begin with.. But Graham and Gronk are SOO cheap compared to other players and what they offer. Even Gronk for 3 years at $7m is a great contract. For the 16th and 17th pick? I'd give that up no problem for a chance at rostering Gronk for that contract.

- braven112
- Site Admin
- Posts: 1265
- Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2007 5:05 pm
- Favorite NFL Team: Seattle Seahawks
- Team Name: Pacific Pigskins
- Location: Seattle, Washington
- Contact:
Re: Franchise Player: TE, Jimmy Graham, NOS
Wascawy Wabbits wrote: That didn't make sense after re-reading it.. LOL
I don't see a huge difference changing w/ the franchised players. They don't typically get bid on to begin with.. But Graham and Gronk are SOO cheap compared to other players and what they offer. Even Gronk for 3 years at $7m is a great contract. For the 16th and 17th pick? I'd give that up no problem for a chance at rostering Gronk for that contract.


- Wascawy Wabbits
- Pro Bowler
- Posts: 788
- Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2012 8:49 pm
- Favorite NFL Team: Kansas City Chiefs
- Team Name: Wascawy Wabits
- Location: BC, Canada
- bocious
- Veteran
- Posts: 233
- Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2011 3:17 pm
- Favorite NFL Team: Seattle Seahawks
- Team Name: Midwestside Connection
Re: Franchise Player: TE, Jimmy Graham, NOS
Can we propose a new rule where we all get to bid on Jimmy Graham? Pretty sure the majority of us would vote "yes" on that.braven112 wrote:Is it to late to place a bid?


- Wascawy Wabbits
- Pro Bowler
- Posts: 788
- Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2012 8:49 pm
- Favorite NFL Team: Kansas City Chiefs
- Team Name: Wascawy Wabits
- Location: BC, Canada
Re: Franchise Player: TE, Jimmy Graham, NOS
He's on the trade block and you can tag him next yearbocious wrote:Can we propose a new rule where we all get to bid on Jimmy Graham? Pretty sure the majority of us would vote "yes" on that.braven112 wrote:Is it to late to place a bid?


Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests